tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post3895075562627372014..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: WikiLeaks and Receiving Stolen PropertySusan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-87062192451532945342010-12-19T09:53:34.731-05:002010-12-19T09:53:34.731-05:00I believe it to be more clear when seen as convers...I believe it to be more clear when seen as conversion.<br />What I find interesting about the statute is that to "purloin" is specifically criminalized.<br />And yet they neglected catburglary.<br />Of course, this is Washington, and we all remember Watergate-- they knew darned well that there was some catburglary going on.<br />And yet they chose not to criminalize it.<br />But they sure got the purloining.<br />I believe the last time that anyone was ever charged with the crime of purloining would be about 1787 or so.<br />I believe they used the word "thou" in the indictment.<br />I move we style this one as the Goldilocks Rule.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com