tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post1865037599010510307..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: RFID CrimeSusan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-1050505868251937972009-03-31T19:13:00.000-04:002009-03-31T19:13:00.000-04:00I'd be amazed to read the legal definition of "Law...I'd be amazed to read the legal definition of "Law Enforcement Officer" which hasn't been abused by less than honorable people in the past.<BR/><BR/>Same difference IMHO. Exemptions are always subject to abuse.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05264903663375248170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-56110507748256596202009-02-23T11:38:00.000-05:002009-02-23T11:38:00.000-05:00I'd be amazed to read the legal definition of "leg...I'd be amazed to read the legal definition of "legitimate researcher" which hasn't been abused by less than honorable people in the past.<BR/><BR/>It is all well and good for EFF and others to fight anything that doesn't include such a clause, but until such a statement can be turned into a legal definition it will continue to be abused. There must be a test that can be applied, both by the researcher and others, that makes it clear whether the research is legitimate.<BR/><BR/>Researchers generally are not professionals since there is no concept of disbarment. Until there is, there's no distinction between them and anyone else, and any exemptions only hamper strong laws and enforcement.<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/>RussRuss Cooperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06942999177709057088noreply@blogger.com