tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post784953391790943408..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: "True Threats" - RevisitedSusan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-9366494574188113052009-08-03T14:56:46.999-04:002009-08-03T14:56:46.999-04:00The 19 months is not the true length of the senten...The 19 months is not the true length of the sentencing, it must be remembered that he was arrested on July 2, 2007 and held without Bail. So the actual time for incarceration is for time served Plus 19 months for a total of 33 months.<br /> <br />The question of what is a threat has been answered in this case that is: what a reasonable person could conceive as a threat. The time frame of information presented to the jury has been limited to the date of posting till discovery. The definition that was not explained or addressed in this case is, what is a Reasonable Person? Should the jury have been able to analyze the full actions of Law Enforcement and Penn State in this case would they have come to the same verdict? If looking at the evidence the violation took place on April on April 18th and 19th, 2007 yet the arrest did not occur until July 2, 2007. The prosecution has tried to emphases the fact that they’re where less then 10 days in the Spring Semester, which ended May 11, 2007, remaining so he was allowed to remain on campus. The fact that Penn State allowed him to complete the Spring Semester and attend the first Summer Semester on the campus from May 20th till July 2nd 2007 was not presented to the jury. Which leaves the real question in this case what is the definition of a Reasonable person?kxvhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06808858462156600116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-47909981488433672562009-08-01T19:53:53.180-04:002009-08-01T19:53:53.180-04:00Doesn't a true threat have to make a person ac...Doesn't a true threat have to make a person actually feel threatened? By the standards of this case, "Someday I'm going to kill someone, just for the fun of it" is a true threat.JoelKatzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09840865938897877532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-53763035744602277892009-08-01T01:27:14.139-04:002009-08-01T01:27:14.139-04:00I think it's stupid they gave him 19 months fo...I think it's stupid they gave him 19 months for this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-71558764221312058562009-07-29T08:15:11.736-04:002009-07-29T08:15:11.736-04:00When it comes to social networks such as Myspace, ...When it comes to social networks such as Myspace, what does the Goverment need to prove interstate communication has occured? This case has answered that question.<br /><br />1) You have a profile or Web Page on that site.<br />2) The Reader is in another State.<br /><br />That is it the Goverment has now established that interstate communication has occurred and that any Blogs or information on the site where created by the owner.kxvhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13907783353895641257noreply@blogger.com