tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post7803383036527401459..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: Juror Misconduct and TechnologySusan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-86050068235032741022010-09-23T08:57:57.548-04:002010-09-23T08:57:57.548-04:00Not a word about jury nullification? What about th...Not a word about jury nullification? What about the theory that "the role of the jury is to see that justice is done" even though the government might disagree?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-38389160032533023592009-03-31T16:44:00.000-04:002009-03-31T16:44:00.000-04:00It would be more balanced to include discussion of...It would be more balanced to include discussion of original standards of due process. In the Founding Era legal argument was made in the presence of the jury, who was expected to review the decisions of the bench in arriving at a general verdict, and could do its own legal research. See <I><A HREF="http://www.constitution.org/usfc/fc/22/Stettinius_v_US.htm" REL="nofollow">Stettinius v. United States</A></I>, 22 F. Cas. 1322 (1839); 5 Cranch C.C. 573.Jon Rolandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14009899449185140706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-41872415207011122992009-03-19T14:28:00.000-04:002009-03-19T14:28:00.000-04:00Good piece.www.johngbrenner.comGood piece.<BR/><BR/>www.johngbrenner.comJohn G. Brennerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17683493223551556873noreply@blogger.com