tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post2528804833189607380..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: Loss, Aggregation and MultiplicitySusan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-59305980390000004592010-02-14T14:41:48.336-05:002010-02-14T14:41:48.336-05:00In this case, it appears that they are aggregating...In this case, it appears that they are aggregating the losses of all charges. On each charge, they are using the same aggregated value. Therefore, the losses from count 1 are used in counts 1, 2, and 3 to meet the $5000 condition. And the same for counts 2 and 3. As a result, the same loss is used 3 times.<br /><br />Wouldn't this create a multiplicious scenario? Or at least make the 3 charges one crime?<br /><br />Additionally, it appears that the US Court of Appeals found in Mr. Lanam's favor and remanded the case back to the district court for a new hearing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com