tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post2477715480006888975..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: Incrimination and Encryption -- UK StyleSusan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-86490186532214379512010-10-08T23:18:10.333-04:002010-10-08T23:18:10.333-04:00is there any case in which the self incrimination ...is there any case in which the self incrimination clause is upheld and on dat reasoning court has refused to give encryption keysAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-77760877545729751162010-02-01T20:44:12.676-05:002010-02-01T20:44:12.676-05:00Very nice. It is an interesting post. What would...Very nice. It is an interesting post. What would happen if he had not been viewing ronnin. Would they still be able to "know" that he had access to the key? <br /><br />Or rather: in logical following:<br /><br />The police saw him viewing evidence on his harddrive.<br /><br />The police therefore "know" he has an encryption key.<br /><br />I mean is having encrpted data in and of itself proof that one has an encryption key?<br /><br />If the computer is fully functional without such key, is the encrypted data still proof that such a key exists?<br /><br />Ie: by the courts logic: if I have an encrypted partition and do not have the key to said partition, and some evidence shows that I am a bad man with a poor choice of occupation with a bad reputation or something else that puts my character in question (ie here some terror-something), then the court can order me to turn over the key?<br /><br />What would be required so that the court objectively knows that the key exists? Testimony of the prosecuter?<br /><br />It seems to me in the american court system the 5th starts with the admission that such key might exist. <br /><br />But then again what do i know. thanks for the article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-20237180216093518002009-07-10T07:46:33.554-04:002009-07-10T07:46:33.554-04:00You did a couple of post as you mention in your po...You did a couple of post as you mention in your post. but i haven't read that.This post is first which i read and i must say that you are doing good job for providing such a nice information.Anwalthttp://www.ag-anwaltspraxis.chnoreply@blogger.com