tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post116059332383706847..comments2023-12-12T03:19:42.467-05:00Comments on CYB3RCRIM3: GPS Tracking and the 4th Amendment: Part 2Susan Brennerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17575138839291052258noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-80054070127488277442016-11-10T09:20:38.282-05:002016-11-10T09:20:38.282-05:00thanks for the post on Car Tracking Devices
that&...thanks for the post on <a href="https://www.bajajallianz.com/Corp/motor-insurance/drivesmart.jsp" rel="nofollow">Car Tracking Devices</a> <br />that's realy informative blog.<br />Sam Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12516693321931522038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-4473576992523295722009-08-16T21:36:11.034-04:002009-08-16T21:36:11.034-04:00When the police put a GPS device on your car, for ...When the police put a GPS device on your car, for that brief time, they have committed both trespass and unlawful possession. In essence, this is unlawful search and seizure. An easy way to analyze what is going on is to look at the scenario where the police would try to put a GPS device on your person. Your body is your property. If the police cannot put a GPS device on your body under the same circumstances as your car, then they could not have put a GPS device on your car. When a person touches you without permission, they have committed trespass. Touching your car without permission is de facto trespass.<br /><br />When the police put a GPS device on your car, they took control of your property and affected it. When a person takes control of another persons's property without permission, even temporary, that is theft. Here the police are asserting they can make claim over your property at any time in order to bring it under their sphere of control in order to affect it to their satisfaction. The police are continually making this claim over your property when they GPS monitor it. This goes against thousands of years of property law. Without a valid warrant, this taking of your property, no matter how brief, is a due process violation. <br /><br />24/7 surveillance is a liberty issue at its core. Arguments for search, seizure, privacy, etcetera are red herrings. Is it a coincidence that the published court cases are silent on the liberty issue? Is it the reasonable person's expectation of liberty to be watched 24/7? Do you like to be watched when you go to the bathroom? If a reasonable person's right to liberty includes 24/7 surveillance then why is stalking unlawful? Simply put, 24/7 surveillence diminishes a person's sense of freedom. The right to liberty is embedded in the core of the US Constitution, and in the 9th amendment for good measure.<br /><br />Keep in mind that courts do issue void case law. Case law, if it contradicts the US Consitution, is null and void. The US Constitution is the People's law, they have every right to interpret it. A judge only has power to discover the law. When they go beyond that, they commit fraud on the court.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-83002827088669439242008-08-05T11:09:00.000-04:002008-08-05T11:09:00.000-04:00Re; Last paragraph. A bumper sticker is a permanen...Re; Last paragraph. A bumper sticker is a permanent fixture and can damage property. Have you ever tried to peel an old one off? It leaves residue and damages a vehicle's finish. The affixation of a bumper sticker is akin to vandalism of private property. Magnetic GPS units can be put on the undercarriage of a car then taken off 3 days later with no damage to private property.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21633793.post-44001728719454105252007-02-24T21:02:00.000-05:002007-02-24T21:02:00.000-05:00Car Photography is off the hook at this site.<A HREF="http://www.miadphotography.com" REL="nofollow"> Car Photography </A> is off the hook at this site.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com